When the battle for Disney World’s Reedy Creek Improvement District (now called the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District) began, few could have predicted that the king of England would get involved.

The new, governor-appointed board members of the District have held a few meetings, and it appears as though they’re not ready to give up the fight just yet. Before Governor DeSantis signed the bill putting Reedy Creek in the hands of a new board, Disney stripped the District of its powers by getting King Charles III involved.

On February 8th, before Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed the bill that changed key aspects of the Reedy Creek Improvement District, the board’s previous members and Disney struck up a development agreement that stripped Reedy Creek of all its power.

Now, the new board is considering challenging these agreements that were approved before the takeover. The developer agreement “set in stone” Disney’s rights over the next 30 years, regardless of what the new board says or does.

The new board has hired multiple law firms to look into “potential legal challenges for matters involving the District that occurred under the prior board of supervisors and that may involve the Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. and its affiliates and subsidiary and related entities.”

Legal counsel hired by the new board indicated they only recently found out about these agreements, despite them being approved in public meetings. Counsel continued by calling the agreements “unusual,” “suspect,” and “unlawful.”

Disney later shared a statement that read:

“All agreements signed between Disney and the District were appropriate, and were discussed and approved in open, noticed public forums in compliance with Florida’s Government in the Sunshine law.”

Florida’s Sunshine Law states all meetings of a municipal agency board or commission must be public along with the records for such meetings.

The agreements made between Disney and the former board include a clause that declares them valid until “21 years after the death of the last survivor of the descendants of King Charles III, king of England,” but why?

Many states, including Florida, have the Rule Against Perpetuities. It states that no person can put terms in a deed or will that would affect ownership of private property after the person has died. It’s designed to prevent a landowner from having control of private property “in perpetuity” or forever.

In Florida, the Rule Against Perpetuities only allows contingencies to be put on ownership for “life plus twenty-one years.” But, Disney has gotten around this rule by adding a royal lives clause to the agreement. In this case, the agreement will be valid until 21 years after King Charles’ last remaining descendant dies.

While the fight may be far from over, we’ll be keeping an eye on updates from Disney and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District — so stay tuned to DFB for more.

New Reedy Creek Board Discusses Potential Lawsuit Against Disney

Join the DFB Newsletter to get all the breaking news right in your inbox! Click here to Subscribe!

What do you think will happen with the District? Let us know in the comments.

The post Why Disney Dragged King Charles Into Its Battle with DeSantis first appeared on the disney food blog.